17 comments » Does your blogroll suck?Blogrolls are nothing more than glorified link farms and that is exactly what Google sees them as.Everybody and their brother has a blogroll. So, it must be OK, right? Wrong. Blogrolls are nothing more than glorified link farms and that is exactly what Google sees them as. There are documented cases of Google penalizing sites for both having a blogroll and getting blogrolled on other sites, so steer clear of this pop blog phenomenon. Want to find out why blogrolls suck and how your real estate blog can do to link to your trusted sources without blogrolling them? Read on.
“Build Natural Links & Avoid Getting Blogrolled - One of the most common elements suspected for sandboxing completely "natural" sites is their addition to blogrolls. These links are sitewides on URLs that frequently have many thousands of pages in Google's index and it appears on the surface that they can cause the link problems that lead to sandboxing. The best way to avoid this is to watch your logs for referring URLs and request to be removed from any blogrolls that are sent to you. With some luck, the sympathetic blogger will understand and remove you. It seems ridiculous to have to go to these extents to avoid sandboxing, but in the commercial reality of the web, it may, in fact, help you in both the short and long run.” What is a blogroll?According to Wikipedia, a Blogroll is a collection of links to other weblogs. When present, blogrolls are often found on the front page sidebar of most weblogs. Blogrolls have recently come under scrutiny by the SEO community and with good reason. And personally, I think they are dead weight for any blog and yet, it seems that every blog and their brother has one. Read also: Moving beyond the blogroll 5 reasons blogrolls suck1. They are nothing but glorified link farms which as we all know, search engines hate. Once you start making lists of links and placing it on your blog, you run the risk of being categorized as a link farm. If you absolutely must place a link farm, I mean, blogroll on your site, put it on an inner page and never, ever in the side bar of each and every blog page. Also, if you have a new site, wait at least 3 months until you are firmly out of the Sandbox before starting a blogroll. Don’t give Google the ammo it needs to dampen your search results any further. Read also: The Google sandbox Explained 2. Blogrolls can bloat a page past the critical link mass that Google determines to be 120 links. Once your home page bloats past 120 links Google will stop crawling new internal links and drop some of your pages of from it’s index. That is a documented behavior of Google. Now, 120 links in a blogroll sounds excessive, but let’s say you have a bunch of buttons and links in articles on your home page (around 50-75 is common for a blog). You need to subtract all those links from the critical mass of 120 to figure out how large your blogroll can grow to before you get dropped. Do you really want to keep track of all the links on your home page to make sure your blogroll doesn’t inadvertently cause the entire thing to get dropped? Probably not. Read also: Too many outbound links will get you dropped from Google 3. While they do provide backlinks to other sites, they do not drive quality traffic. Very few readers actually look at or care about your blogroll. The only people who care are the ones on it or the ones that want to be on it because they think it will provide them with a much needed backlink. Fact is, if a blogroll is on each page of your site, it gives the blogrolled site a staggering amount of links from a single source which Google considers suspicious. Also, because blogrolls only use the site name as the anchor text in the link, those links are actually weighted less heavily than a single quality link within an article that has valuable anchor text. Read also: Using links to generate traffic and retain visitors 4. Who are you really placing on your blogroll? From what I see of blogrolls in real estate – they are just popularity contests… long lists of people that you know that also have blogs or people who have requested that their blog be added to your roll. In theory, blogrolls are meant to have only a select number of high quality resource links. If you have a blogroll, prune it. Look at the links, only include blogs that have real quality content your readers will be interested in and make sure the blogs you are linking to have at least a PR3 or above. Nix anything with a PR 0-2. If you want to be super discriminating, nix anything with less than a PR5.
Read also: Ultimate guide to building backlinks 5. They are a pain in the butt to keep updated This was my primary reason for not using a blogroll on RSS Pieces site. The stress of keeping the thing up to date and the uncomfortable experience of having to tell someone you won’t blogroll their site when they ask just made a blogroll unappealing to me. When I find sites I like, I mention them in articles. It helps me share my link love and increases the likelihood of my readers clicking through to the site which is what is most valuable… traffic. How to share your link love of another site without using a blogrollInstead of blogrolling your trusted sources or associates link to those sites naturally in articles that directly relate to the topics on their sites. This way you provide quality backlinks to your resources and ensure more click throughs to those sites. Recommendation to those of you with blogrollsIf you have a blogroll, nix it. If you are dead set on keeping it, confine it to one single page on your blog and only display a select few of the blogrolled sites on your homepage (no more than 10). If you are a new site and want a blogroll, wait 3 months before adding it to avoid further Sandboxing. Related PostsLong tail, short tail and coat tail searchesLearn How To SEO Your Blog SEO Autopsy: see your site like Google does Canonicalization: is it killing your website? Stop Word List http://www.rsspieces.com/000332
Posted on January 18, 2007 14:43:57
Comment from: Tim [Visitor] While SE's may say Blogrolls are a bad thing, I have to disagree. As a regular blogroll surfer, when I find an interesting blog, I bookmark it and then look for the blogroll/links. For the most part, these blogrolls are just another good source of information on the related subject I want to read about. If Google, Yahoo or MSN consider them bad, they are doing their users a dis-service by penalizing blogs that have a blogroll. Yeah, some people will abuse the blogroll linking model, but the blogroll is still a useful information search tool for me, my friends and co-workers. Maybe it's time to set the search engines companies straight. When they (search engines)do our thinking for us, we all lose. Comment from: Joel Burslem [Visitor] You bring up a good point here. I was already feeling like my blogroll was overwhelming my front page, so I've shuttle all my links to a secondary page like you suggested. If you use Wordpress you can use the tag to do this automatically for you. More here: http://wiki.wordpress.org/?pagename=Links%20Management Comment from: Steve Leung [Visitor] A British friend of mine calls them "bogrolls" which is what they call toilet paper over there. Seems appropriate given their length and what they do to readability! Comment from: Jay Thompson [Visitor] I like blogrolls. Granted, many RE blogolls all look the same. But on several occasions I've found a real gem o' blog tucked into someone's blogroll. However, they are definitely a PITA to maintain, and mine was getting quite lengthy. So I used the build in WP function to display 10 random links in the blogroll and I show the entire list on a separate page. Comment from: Andy [Visitor] · http://andybeard.eu Don't toss your blogroll - just use the nofollow tag http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/how-a-blogroll-can-kill-your-pagerank.html Comment from: Derek Burress [Visitor] My blogroll serves one purpose - as a bookmark for the sites I read myself. My bookmark on my browser is only 3 links - I am that organized! If Google is going to penalize my site, then fine with me. I blog for the fun of it not the business aspect so I don't care if I am in the sandbox or how bad my site ranks. All my real estate bookmarks are on my real estate site and all my personal bookmarks are on my personal site. The way I see it, if I am at school and on my laptop or another computer, I got everything I need on my site somewhere! Comment from: Andrew Maury [Visitor] I had no idea that blogrolls could be such a negative from the view of search engines! I'm still unsure about getting rid of mine completely though. I like checking out blogrolls on other sites and feel like it's a way to show other sites that I like. Maybe I'll consider putting them all on one page of my site. Comment from: Jonathan Dalton [Visitor] Mary, I'd never doubt you. But I do question why so many blogs I see with lengthy blogrolls still are high in the SERP. My new site has a blogroll. It has been active for about two weeks. It's now 60th on the search Phoenix Arizona Real Estate Blog. Maybe I'll top out, maybe not. But if I change, I'll likely go Jay's route and more for appearance than anything else. I'm just not seeing the harm. Comment from: Gerhard [Member] Comment from: Nigel Swaby [Visitor] This post kind of reminds me of the harsh cold weather much of the nation is currently facing. Like global warming, there is no such thing as the Google sandbox. As far as blogrolls go, I agree with Jay, sometimes I go to sites and use them as a directory to the site I really want to go to. I'm sure others feel the same way. I just installed blogrolling to help manage my links better. It's very cool and makes adding links easy. I was just going to add this site, but I guess I won't. Comment from: jf.sellsius [Visitor] Will the rel="nofollow" recommended by Andy Beard and others solve the PR issue? Comment from: Andreas Tennyson [Visitor] · http://iksy.com oh we didn't care,we made it very clea. Andreas Tennyson. Comment from: Christina [Visitor] I have heard of this just recently and am still confused about why these links if revelant to your page are so bad? Comment from: Chris Lang [Visitor] I really think you have blogrolls all wrong. Just adding anybody to your blogroll is wrong. Linking to quality sites in you blogroll is priceless. Read this link with documentation taken from the latest Google patent. http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=71 Let my know what you think. Comment from: Guest [Visitor] Chris,
Comment on this article This post has 2 feedbacks awaiting moderation... |