Need Ideas to Blog About?
Get better search placement fast
26 comments »Are you Looking Down the Long End of a Cybersquatting Law Suit?
Heres what I learned:
Cybersquatting, according to the United States federal law known as the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad-faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. (Note: violating this Act is a FEDERAL crime and punishable with jail time and/or monetary damages as the sentencing guidelines treat the copyright and trademark violations that govern cybersquatting like theft and fraud.) Now, notice that the above statement doesnt say 'registered trademark.' Why? Because case law has held that certain 'unregistered trademark rights' exist and are enforceable under cybersquatting laws. That means that even if your competitor hasnt registered their company name, product or domain as a trademark , their attorney may be able to reasonably assert their unregistered trademark rights. Just take a look at the 2005 case outlined below: Case law: BC Fax It Limited v. It's The Fax Ltd. Ryan Galovich (2005) The Plaintiff was victimized by a competitor who had registered the companys business name as a domain name. Having registered the domain name, the competitor was using it to redirect customers to his own competing website. The attorneys, by properly asserting their clients unregistered trademark rights, were able to recover the domain name.
What is the basic premise of the law? According to the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, congress finds that the unauthorized registration or use of trademarks as Internet domain names or other identifiers of online locations (commonly known as `cybersquatting')-- (1) results in consumer fraud and public confusion as to the true source or sponsorship of products and services; (2) impairs electronic commerce, which is important to the economy of the United States; and (3) deprives owners of trademarks of substantial revenues and consumer goodwill. Example of Cybersquatting in the real estate blogosphere Check out the WhoIs entry for RSSPiece.com and RSSPeices.com These entries have redirected to RSS Pieces competitor since March 14, 2007. UPDATE: In direct response to this post, Jason Benesch of Real Estate Tomato removed the redirect to the Real Estate Tomato site on June 26, 2007 and his contact information from the WhoIs directory on June 29, 2007. Unfortunately, that does not negate the crime perpetrated against us for the past 3 months. Jason, should you want to resolve this issue among others, contact our attorneys, you know the numbers. How to avoid a cybersquatting suit? Manage your business ethically and with dignity. Do not knowingly purchase domains similar to your competitors with the intention of redirecting traffic intended for their website to your own. Cybersquatting is a sleazy practice and the deceptive business practices associated with redirecting traffic from the rightful recipient site is tantamount to consumer fraud as the law and sentencing guidelines outline. If, for some reason, you accidentally purchase a domain of another company (within your same industry) and they claim you are cybersquatting, make an arrangement to turn over the offending domain quickly. On the other hand, if you do not believe that the domain infringes on the companys rights, then cite the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and clearly show how your purchase and use of the domain does not meet the criteria for cybersquatting. In this instance, you should also hire an attorney to review the matter. What you can do if a competitor is squatting on your domains? (1) while you should always contact your attorney first, you can contact the site owner directly, cite the Anti-cybersquatting Act and request that they immediately turn over the domains to you (2) if the site owner does not turn over the domains, definitely contact your attorney and ask that he/she serve the offending party with a Cease and Desist Notice (3) if a notice from your attorney does not work or you believe that the redirection of traffic from those domains has caused you financial harm, take the offender to court! Be aware that the sentencing guidelines for this crime can include both monetary damages and jail time. UPDATE: April 13, 2008: Karen Loehman's Blog finds that Real Estate Tomato ownes www.pixelnazi.com RET's chief marketing moron, Jason Benesch has now redirected a domain with the word "nazi" in it to the primary site. This is just so offensive, I cannot even begin to put it into words. If this, as Karen claims is a marekting tactic, it is sleezy and cheap, but then again, what would I expect out of the same crew that steals code, cybersquats ad gets their own client unindexed? Since I figure they will remove the redirect shortly and change the WhoIs info, here's a screen shot:
Posted in Announcements Comment from: Laurie.Manny [Member] Dang girl, I guess you are cooking up Tomato Soup. The RE Tomato should not have done that. I guess they needed the extra business they could get through the misspellings of your name. Comment from: Loren Nason [Visitor] WOW, I hate cybersquatters and i have lost all respect for the owners of those domains The funny thing about squatters is that they can always find a way to justify what they have done. I guess if they lie to themselves enough they may even start to believe it but I know the truth. I can clearly see that they are trying to ride on the back of your company and that is not cool. I think they need to start doing the right thing and acting like a real company before they get squashed or crushed or whatever it is that you do to rotten tomatos. Fight the good fight.
Comment from: Mary.McKnight [Member] Thanks for the support. We are letting our attorneys handle that matter along with some other far more serious complaints in court. Comment from: Robert Ashby [Visitor] Thanks for the info. I had never thought of competitors doing this, but I need to check mine out. I know that several companies are now duping my name but dropping the Corporation and calling it something else. I know since my business and web presence has grown extensively, people are trying to use my name to divert business their way, but my lawyers said there is nothing legal that I can do, at least not yet. Comment from: Mary.McKnight [Member] Robert, You may want to check with an attorney that specializes in Internet law as there are defintiely things you can do to recover your domains and prevent competitors from infringing on your trademark and diverting your rightful traffic. Comment from: JeffX [Visitor] On the bright side...imitation is the sincerest compliment one can give ;) Comment from: JeffX [Visitor] I just went to the rsspiece.com url....looks like the lightbulb may have finally gone off (maybe) in someones head.... I would like the think that they have learned the difference between right and wrong but instead I think it is the difference between write and wrong. It looks like they have a habit of doing things half-assed and then scrambling to recover. Guess what tomato? Changing the page doesn't absolve you of what you have done. It is clear by the whois directory that you and your cohorts are responsible and just taking down that link doesn't undo what you have done. Where I can donate to the legal fund? I'll tell you what, I will buy 10 blogs from you if it will help keep scum like the tomato and company from doing business. I'll be calling you shortly.
Comment from: Mary.McKnight [Member] Glad to see that they finally heeded something since repeated contact from our attorneys didn't seem to work. However, the sad part here is that, you can't unsteal a car. We will still see them in court as these are not the only nor the most severe complaints we have against them. While they may have turned off their redirects, they have not yet made any attempts to turn over those domains to us, adhere to the Cease and Desist, or work out the copyright infringement issues. Their M.O. has been to pull stuff once they are caught and claim they never did it. So, that is why I linked to the WhoIs entry rather than the sites so visitors could actually see who the culprit(s) are. Comment from: Robert Ashby [Visitor] I haven't had a chance to review this law as yet, but I was wondering what your thoughts are about someone using my a very similar domain, but using mtg instead of mortgage. Would that likely still be a violation? There is a company doing that here in FL using my company name (different ending) and similar domain. To mee, it sounds like a probable infringement. Comment from: Doug Trudeau [Visitor] Great investigation and reporting. This is one for Real Estate Carnival. Comment from: Mary.McKnight [Member] Robert, You should deifnitely check on that with a cyber attorney. Here is the link to our attorneys whom we highly recommend. They are extremely aggressive and their focus is on Internet law so they are also extremely capable. I hope that is helpful. Comment from: teresa boardman [Visitor] I never heard of cyber squating before. I do own domains that are mispellings of my own domains and bought a common mispelling of my own name. Comment from: Mary.McKnight [Member] Teresa, Cybersquatting is a common issue companies run into. When it really becomes a serious problem is when a competitor purchases a similar domain and redirects traffic to their site intended for yours. It makes sense that you would try to protect your own domain by purchasing similar mispellings of your own name as personal names could often be misspelled. You, of course have done everything above board, in good taste and with ethics and not purchased the names of your competitors in an effort to defraud the consumer. Companies that do that should expect to be pursecuted to the fullest extent the law allows. Comment from: geno petro [Visitor] Hey Mary...hope you're doing well. Interesting and timely topic for me as I've just been witness to this. An agent in our office got into an internet scuffle with another agent/blogger; blackballing, nasty e-mailing and comment deleting got out of hand and presto...the competing advesary registered my associate's domain. I thought it was pretty funny but nobody else did. Comment from: Mary.McKnight [Member] Hey Geno, Wow. There are a lot of unscrupulous out there, willing to do anything no matter how unethical to get ahead. We still find the issue with our competitor pretty funny, but in the same vein, we still need to protect the right to our property. I hope the agent in your office takes the high road and pursues it legally rather than getting down in the mud with the other party. That is the only way to keep your own dignity. Comment from: Mark Flanders [Visitor] Hmmm, this bears watching. Thanks for the heads-up Mary. Good luck in the ensuing battle. Have ethics become out of fashion and I didn't get the memo? Comment from: Colleen Kulikowski [Visitor] Unbelievable that someone would do it. Just wrong. Comment from: Mary.McKnight [Member] Mark, Thanks for the support in our legal battle. Always fun to go to Federal court becasue a couple of people can't play well with others or admit when they are wrong. The cybersquatting thing is truly the least of the charges we have against them. They actually stole proprietary source code from our client sites, then used it on their own client sites (for which they charged almost $2K) and claimed it was Open Source. Colleen, We, too, find it unbelievable that so-called "professionals" would beak the law simply to become more competitive. They had been warned repeatedly by our attorneys that we intended to pursue these matters, including being served with a Cease and Desist, but the only thing that has actually worked thus far is this post, a public shaming. They have finally pulled the redirect from the domain in response to this post. It almost makes me wonder what a post citing the evidence of the non-Open Source Code theft would do. But, I guess we will just let that one shake out in court. UPDATE: Jason Benesch of Real Estate Tomato has pulled his name and contact information form the WhoIs.net directory as of June 29,2007 so the public can no longer see his offense. Too bad it doesn't undo the crime or the evidence against him and the Real Estate Tomato. Comment from: Ines [Member] Mary - you know how I feel about this and find it absolutely appalling and for Jeff-X...one thing is imitation and another is stealing - that's just WRONG! Comment from: chris [Visitor] Cyber squatting is indead a henious crime but if the offender is in a foreign country how do we pursue them through the courts? Comment from: Randy [Visitor] Hello, Wayback in 1999, I was looking into registering a domain name... I looked on whois for the url, thought about it to make sure it was the name that I wanted to register. (Domain names were $35 back then.) I said yeah, that's it. I went back and in the 2-3 hours it took me to think about it, someone was apparantly domain name sniffing and had scarfed the .com version of the url I wanted. I wasn't too picky and settled for the .net version, which I still have today. (And the .com version that "other" guy still has as well.) They have done absolutely nothing with the domain name, not even parked it. Oh well. It's not quite cyber squatting, but could be or it comes real close. Thanks, I just found your blog and love all your ideas. Comment from: Jeff Dowler [Visitor] Nevere heard of the term before but was aware of the practice. I also have some domains that are misspellings but need to check further into others just in case. Thanks for the discussion. Unfortunately as the blogging world grows I expect there will be more and more infringements and lawsuits will increase as we saw in the early dot.com days regarding theft of intellectual material. Comment from: Neal The Real Deal Bloom [Visitor] Very interesting thread...I think I have seen this. Comment from: Thomas Martin [Visitor] Never heard of cybersquating but thanks for the heads up! Comment on this article This post has no feedback awaiting moderation... |

Like what you are reading here? Then let us email you with all our new content.

Order the eBook
Ever buy a competitors domain or one extremely similar to it or even a misspelled version, then redirect that site to your own? If so, you very well may be looking at a law suit. Because I see it happen quite a bit in the real estate blogosphere, I thought Id do a little research and explain the low down on cybersquatting so you can evaluate whether you are squatting on someone elses property or if someone is trespassing on yours.
Posted in