5 comments » NUTSHELL SEO: why redirecting keyword rich domains to your vanity domain doesn't do a lick for SEOThe first SEO myth I want to dispel is the theory that redirecting a bunch of keyword rich domains to your primary site that is possibly a vanity site (i.e. yourname.com) will improve the overall SEO value of your primary site.Introducing John McKnight: for those of you that don't know or can't tell by the last name, John is my husband and his claim to fame beyond that is writing the automatically SEOing blogging platform RSS Pieces' blogs run on. I have convinced him to write some posts here that may be a bit geekier and filled with more technical explanations than my average post. So, without further ado...
First things first.
One of the things that I find annoying is when people couch marketing
advice as SEO advice - make no mistake, these are not the same things and they
shouldn't be assumed to be. The first
SEO myth I want to dispel is the theory that redirecting a bunch of keyword
rich domains to your primary site that is possibly a vanity site (i.e.
yourname.com) will improve the overall SEO value of your primary site. If you want the SEO value of a keyword rich
domain, then use the keyword rich one as your primary domain and redirect your
vanity domain to it, so you can use the vanity domain on your business cards!
Related PostsDoes your blogroll suck?Long tail, short tail and coat tail searches Canonicalization: is it killing your website? The 7 Worst Pieces of SEO Advice Get the most out of your meta tags http://www.rsspieces.com/001AC1
Posted on January 28, 2008 01:37:14
Comment from: Todd Carpenter [Visitor] I agree with all of this. But what if you built single property sites with content, and you did it before you ever listed a house? If you look at Trulia's game, they are focused on acheiving #1 search reults for each and every listing on the market. I think there is SEO value in these sites, but the idea is to deive that traffic to the single propert site itself.If I was an agent, I would buy an addressed derived domain name for every property in my marketing farm. I'd go out and take pictures from the street of every house. I'd put up data related directly to the house, and links to a neighborhood blog that I would run. I would own the google juice on that address long before a potential lister ever thought to sell.
Comment from: Jason [Visitor] Very well said and very well written. Regarding Todd's comments. I've tried it both ways. Have major sites with lots of specific pages, and having simple sites for specific product. or said another way. I have tried putting all my eggs in one basket, and I have worked on one egg at a time. The challenge is the resources it takes to create and then properly seo each and every specific site. I appreciate RSS for that reason because they offer a product that reduces the amount I HAVE TO SPEND ON EACH AND EVERY SITE. In the past, the time and energy it took to grow each site was out of the question, but using a blog site that grows regularly with minimal effort makes this idea much more reasonable. I had switched back to developing major sites some years back because of the trust value for the SEs, but I'm going back to my old plan to build lots of very specific sites (instead of a site filled with financial services, I'll build a site for each service) now that I can grow them effectively. And I've already experienced success with quite a few clients. Comment from: theAve [Visitor] I was considering creating mutliple sites until I read this article. Now I see it might be best to continue to add good content to the one site that I have.
Comment from: Scott [Visitor] I took your advice to heart. I had our blog attached to a "vanity" domain name site. It's been a tough road moving the blog and back links but over time I am hoping this strategy pays off. Comment from: Peter [Visitor] Like theave i was considering creatin mulible keyword rich sites in order to 301 redrect them. It is great to know that I can just save the time and the money. Thanks for the advice Comment on this article This post has 3 feedbacks awaiting moderation... |